Observations on Long Island Wines 40th Anniversary
This commentary was previously published on the New York Cork Report www.newyorkcorkreport.com
This commentary was previously published on the New York Cork Report www.newyorkcorkreport.com
This year Long Island wine is celebrating the
40th anniversary of the first vinifera grape plantings by Louisa and Alex
Hargrave that kicked off the Long Island wine region. As one who arrived
very late to Long Island Wine some ten years ago, my perspective is somewhat
different than that of the wine professionals and writers who have watched the
evolution of wine making on Long Island over the past 40 years and the
establishment of a solid wine region that today is acknowledged as producing
both outstanding and unique wines.
Although I was raised and educated in Northeastern Pennsylvania,
and was familiar with wine production in the Fingers Lakes region, I was not
introduced to Long Island Wine until we moved to New York in 2003. For
the previous 30 years, I was either travelling consistently for business to
California from the East Coast, or after moving to California in 1982 living
there for 20 years and learning about wine from a West Coast perspective.
As I am not a wine professional but rather a wine enthusiast.
California became my frame of reference for domestic wine, and how it compared
to traditional European wines. When I went to California in the 1970s it
was all about Napa and Sonoma, particularly after California wines proved to be
at least the equal of great European wines in a series of wine competitions. By
the 1980s it was about the emerging West Coast wine regions that — like Long
Island — began in the early 1970s. New vineyards had been planted from Santa
Barbara, up the Central Coast to Paso Robles, to Monterey, to Santa Cruz, along
the Sonoma Coast to Mendocino, and up to the Willamette Valley of Oregon.
Very much like Long Island, each of these regions experimented
with multiple varieties and by the late 1980s to early 1990s each of these West
Coast regions began to focus on one or two grapes or styles. Santa Barbara’s
Santa Ynez Valley, with a hotter climate, found chardonnay and Southern Rhone
varieties were a good match, while the cooler Sta. Rita Hills and Santa Maria
regions focused on cool-climate pinot noir and lean chardonnay. Further
North in the Paso Robles hotter regions, zinfandel became the grape, while in
cooler portions of that region Southern Rhone grapes were selected, as they
were in Southern Monterrey The cooler Santa Lucia Highlands of
the Carmel Valley selected pinot noir, as did Santa Cruz and the Sonoma Coastal
wine regions. In Mendocino’s cool climate white varieties were the
predominate wines. In Oregon’s Willamette Valley, pinot noir was the main
vareity although cool-climate whites such as pinot blanc, pinot gris and
riesling were being planted and producing excellent wines. Later Washington
State focused on riesling in the cooler Colombia River region, while merlot and
cabernet sauvignon were the main grapes in the hotter Walla Walla wine region.
When I began to explore the Long Island wine region starting in
2003, there were a number of surprises — some positive and some less so.
First, while not really knowing the history of Long Island
viticulture, I was overwhelmed by the beautiful vineyards found on the East
End. It was clear that there were serious proprietors and vineyard
managers who invested in developing outstanding vineyards. Unlike the
developing West Coast wine regions that were located on hillsides, Long Island
was more like the Napa Valley with broad flat vineyards. Second, I was
impressed with the number of substantial wineries and large attractive tasting
rooms. The newer West Coast wine regions, unlike established Napa and
Sonoma regions, tended to have far fewer fully equipped wineries and far less
extensive tasting rooms. And of course I found the leaner more European-style
red wines to be very appealing, particularly in comparison to the big, fruity
and high alcohol wines from Napa and Sonoma.
Ten years ago there were some disappointments. My biggest
problem back then was the big variation in quality between the top producers
and the lower-tier producers, and quality issues in certain wines, particularly
whites, from both top and lesser producers. I had just not experienced
such major variation in quality on the West Coast — especially given that Long
Island wines, as they remain today, were priced at the upper levels of the
domestic wine price range.
My second problem ten years ago was that after finding great
wines at the wineries, when I went back to Manhattan, it was difficult or
impossible to find the wines being sold at wine stores. Not only could I not
buy in Manhattan, I could not have friends in Pennsylvania or California also
experience the wines I was enjoying.
Another issue with the Long Island wine region was — unlike the
developing West Coast regions — there did not seem to be a distinctive variety
that identified Long Island Wine. Ten years ago Long Island seemed to be
continuing to experiment with many grapes and many wine-making styles, including
some that were not well suited.
By 2006 when we purchased a house on the East End, I was
completely committed to the land, the wine-making and wine of Long Island.
The wine cellar at our house was quickly filled with the best wines I could
find at wineries and local retail stores. I seriously considered investing in a
vineyard, and becoming an active member of the Long Island wine community. I
was fortunate to be introduced to top winemakers and proprietors and eagerly
took on a role at the Long Island Merlot Alliance (now Merliance) in 2008 as I
had concluded merlot and merlot-based blends represented the best of Long
Island.
After two years back in the aerospace industry, when in 2011 I
returned to New York I was pleased to find that Long Island wine remained
robust during difficult economic times. New wineries, new brands and new
approaches were being pursued. While no one variety has emerged as defining
Long Island wine, there do appear to be positive trends.
Fortunately the issue of wine quality has significantly improved
in the ten years I have been observing Long Island wine, although it is far
from completely solved. As the lowest quality producer or wine remains
the weakest link in the reputation of the a wine region, it seems to me to be
important that the collective of Long Island wine ensures that all wine being
produced is of high quality. Unfortunately, as consumer interest in merlot
remains low, one of Long Island’s strengths has had a run of bad luck.
But as leaner, lower alcohol, aromatic wines are popular with consumers, Long
Island is well positioned with it maritime climate. As a top winemaker
has said, “Long Island does not have adjust to make these wines; it is what we
have always made.”
A number of white varietals and in particular white blends,
sparkling wines and rosés are increasingly being seen as the potential defining
wines of Long Island.
Distribution is also improving, but in my opinion has far to go.
Yes, today it is much easier to buy Long Island wines in Manhattan and
throughout the greater New York area, but try to buy Long Island wine in
Philadelphia, or San Francisco, or Portland. Fortunately, wine shipment
regulations have improved and it is now possible to ship wine to many of these
locations. And in addition to distribution, price remains an issue, While I
know firsthand how expensive Long Island vineyard land is, how expensive
productions costs are, these costs are as high or higher on the West Coast, and
there are far more lower priced California, Oregon and Washington wines in the
marketplace than there are Long Island wines. This remains a major challenge.
Congratulations to all those that are and have been engaged in
Long Island Wine over the past 40 years, The progress has been great and
the potential remains even greater.
No comments:
Post a Comment